tcepsa: (Default)
[personal profile] tcepsa
What was the primary reason that the dot-coms failed?

Date: 2005-12-29 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadeofnight.livejournal.com
Yes.

I have worked for 3 different startups so far. One was able to fight to the point it was profitable and I made money off the stock options I had. The other two failed, and it was sad.

You also had a lot of people going around forming companies with no other purpose than to "get bought or bust". On other words they never planned on turning a profit, but wanted to put a threat on one industry or the other and force other companies to buy them out. What kills so many good companies is when doing the "wrong thing for the health of the company" makes "them" so much money they can not help but pull in all that cash. In the end they are rich and the company is dead. This is one of the reasons to work for a startup, you need to be either A) in on the stock option game to make a lot of fast cash and be one of the people with the golden escape routes, or B) Have trust in the company/owners not to sell you out for a fast buck.

The other thing to keep in mind is most startups loss money hand over fist for up to the first 3 to 6 years even with a rocking product!. It just takes so much capital to start up a company and grow it. So even the companies that where doing good and on their 2 to 3 year (with the chance to turn a profit in the 4th year) all crashed and burned when the money was pulled out of the market.

The other term a lot of people use for the end of the dot-com days was the "popping of the bubble". It was a lot of hot air all contained in a small little bubble of wishful thinking. One pin prick and it all went away :)

Profile

tcepsa: (Default)
tcepsa

April 2015

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 04:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios